Prelinguistic Milieu Teaching Definition Essay

There are a number of methods and techniques for working with toddlers who don’t yet communicate effectively with others.  When we think about these methods, we often group them into two larger categories: indirect and direct. Indirect, or input-based, methods rely on adults providing lots of rich language in a child’s environment; with these methods, however, we don’t requirechildren to do anything in the moment. There is considerable evidence to support these input-based methods, especially for late-talkers and toddlers and preschoolers who struggle with the grammatical aspects of language. Despite the effectiveness of input-based methods in some situations, there are times when these indirect methods of language facilitation aren’t all that are needed.  In these cases, we might choose to use a more direct method of helping a child to communicate.  Direct methods involve expecting a child to do something – to use a gesture, or a word, for example – right in the moment when we are teaching them. This is where prelinguistic milieu teaching enters the picture.

Prelinguistic milieu teaching (PMT) is designed to help children who aren’t yet using intentional communication on a regular basis. To understand this, we first need to quickly discuss the difference between communication and language.  Communication is a broader term than language. It encompasses all the ways that we communicate a message to other people – head nods, pointing at things, shrugging our shoulders, sighs, vocalizations (sounds we make that aren’t actually words), talking, writing, and so on. Language is a more specific term – it refers to the words and sentences we use to communicate with others.  Young children communicate with gestures and sounds before they use actual words. This type of communication typically develops around 9-12 months and is called intentional communication.  PMT, then, is designed for children who are older than 9-12 months and who haven’t yet learned to intentionally communicate with gestures, eye contact and vocalizations, or who don’t intentionally communicate very often.  Our goal is to get these children consistently using gestures, eye contact, and vocalizations to express their wants and needs. Once they are doing that, we can help them start using words. 

When we use prelinguistic milieu teaching, we set up situations in which a child is going to want to communicate about something.  Much of the time with young children, this happens within routines or communication temptations.  So, the first step in using PMT is to establish a routine or a communication temptation. The routine or communication temptation can be almost anything at all – a song, pat-a-cake, tickles, rocking back in forth in a rocking chair, playing peek-a-boo, rolling a ball back and forth, sending a car down a ramp, swinging on a swing and stopping the swing for a moment, going down a slide repeatedly, handing out favorite snacks one by one…. the possibilities are truly endless.  The key is to find something a child likes, do it interactively and repeatedly and then, at the right moment, STOP.  Wait. Watch for any indication that the child wants the activity to continue. At first, this might involve the child glancing at the object he wants and then glancing back at you.  Or it might be a slight body movement, a sound he makes, or a gesture such as reaching or pointing.  As soon as the child does something to communicate, we say the word for what the child is trying to communicate (this is called linguistic mapping) and continue with the routine. Over time, we expect the child’s communication to become more and more advanced.  We show a child how to use gestures and his voice at the same time to keep an activity going.  And eventually, once a child has learned the power of communicating, we can work with the child to use actual words.

Here’s a quick snippet of what PMT might look like in action:

Child is getting tickled by an adult

Adult: I’m going to….adult wiggles fingers…tickle you!! [Establishing routine & using self-talk]

Adult tickles child, child giggles & adult laughs

Adult: I’m going to….adult wiggles fingers…tickle you!! [Establishing routine & using self-talk]

Adult tickles child, child giggles & adult laughs

Adult: I’m going to….adult wiggles fingers…tickle you!! [Establishing routine & using self-talk]

Adult tickles child, child giggles & adult laughs

Adult: I’m going to….adult wiggles finger and STOPS. [This is setting up a communication temptation as part of an interactive, mutually enjoyed routine]

Adult waits. [This is a time delay]

Child looks at and reaches hands out toward adult [This is the child communicating he wants more tickles!]

Adult: Tickle you!!! [This is “linguistic mapping” because the adult says what the child wanted after the child communicated]

Adult tickles child, child giggles and adult laughs [In behavioral terms, this is the reinforcement – or the reward – that makes it more likely the child will communicate again in this situation in the future.]

Prelinguistic milieu teaching has been shown to increase a young child’s use of communication – and this is thought to then lead to increases in language development.  Yoder and Warren (1998, 1999, 2001), for example, found that PMT led to increases in intentional communication acts (the use of eye contact, gestures, and vocalizations to communicate) and that these gains impacted later language development. Importantly, they also found that PMT only had an impact on child communication when the children in the study had highly responsive moms.  This led them to add “responsivity education” (RE) to the PMT training, so that the approach is now called RE/PMT (“Responsivity Training/Prelinguistic Milieu Training”); in this approach, parents are taught how to be responsive to their child, while clinicians use PMT with that same child.  Further research (Fey et al., 2006) indicated that RE/PMT was effective in increasing the use of communication acts for toddlers with developmental delays after 6 months of intervention.  Later research, however (Warren, et al., 2008) suggested that these gains in communication did not consistently led to later gains in language development.   It’s important to note that the RE/PMT training in the 2008 research was discontinued after 6 months; further research is needed to determine how long RE/PMT should be used in order to have an impact on later language development.

It should be also mentioned there are other ways of working with young children who don’t yet communicate with others on a regular basis.  For example, the use of signs or other types of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) has also been shown to be effective in promoting language development (Romski, Sevcki, Barton-Hulsey, & Whitmore, 2015). Prelinguistic milieu training, though, is one powerful option to consider when working with young children who don’t yet consistently communicate through the use of vocalizations, gestures, and eye contact.

1. Short A, Schopler E. Factors relating to age of onset in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmntal Disorders. 1988;18:207–216.[PubMed]

2. DeMyer M, Hingtgen J, Jackson R. Infantile autism reviewed: A decade of research. Schizophrenia Review. 1981;7(3):388–451.[PubMed]

3. Paul R, Cohen D. Outcomes of severe disorders of language acquisition. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 1984;14(4):405–421.[PubMed]

4. Venter A, Lord C, E S. A follow-up study of high-functioning autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1992;33(3):489–507.[PubMed]

5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: APA Press; 1994.

6. Chawarska K, Volkmar F. In: Autism in Infancy and Early Childhood, in Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental DIsorders. Volkmar F, et al., editors. Wiley: New York: 2005. In Press.

7. Chawarska K, Volkmar F. Autism Spectrum Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. N.Y.: Guilford; 2008.

8. Osterling J, Dawson G. Early recognition of children with autism: A study of first birthday home videotapes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 1994;24(3):247–257.[PubMed]

9. Paul R, et al. Dissociations of development in early communication in autism spectrum disorders. In: Paul R, editor. Language disorders from a developmental perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.

10. Dawson G, et al. Affective exchanges between young autistic children and their mothers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1990;18(3):335–345.[PubMed]

11. Kasari C, et al. Affective sharing in the context of joint attention interactions of normal, autistic, and mentally retarded children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1990;20(1):87–100.[PubMed]

12. Lord C, McGee J. Social development. In: Lord C, McGee J, editors. Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2001. pp. 66–81.

13. Sigman M, Norman K. Continutity and change in the development of children with autism. In: Broman S, Fletcher J, editors. The changing nervous system: Neurobehaviroal consequesnces of early brain disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. pp. 274–291.

14. Wetherby A, Prizant B, Hutchinson T. Communicative, social\affective, and symbolic profiles of young children with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 1998;7(2):79–91.

15. Mundy P, Stella J. Joint attention, social orienting, and nonverbal communication in autism. In: Wetherby AmyM, Prizant BarryM., editors. Autism spectrum disorders: A transactional developmental perspective Communication and language intervention series. vol 9. 2000. pp. 55–77. xvii, 422pp. 2000.

16. Lord C, McGee J. Educating Children with Autism. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 2002.

17. Sheinkopf J, et al. Vocal atypicalities of preverbal autistic children. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders. 2000;30:345–354.[PubMed]

18. Schoen L, et al. National Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Chicago, IL: 2003. Phonological behaviors in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders.

19. Schoen L, et al. Symposium for Research in Child Language Disorders. Madison, WI: 2007. Acoustic measurements of prelinguistic vocalizations in toddlers with ASD.

20. Stone WL, et al. Nonverbal communication in two- and three-year-old children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1997;27(6):677–696.[PubMed]

21. Rogers S, Cook I, Meryl A. Imitation and play in autism. In: V F, et al., editors. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders. New York: Wiley; 2005. pp. 382–405.

22. Wetherby A, Prutting C. Profiles of communicative and cognitive-social abilities in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1984;27:364–377.[PubMed]

23. Charman T, et al. Predicting language outcome in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorder. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2003;38(3):265–285.[PubMed]

24. Goldstein H. Communication Intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2002;32:373–396.[PubMed]

25. Paul R, Sutherland D. Enahncing early language in children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Volkmar FR, et al., editors. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders. Wiley & Sons: New York; 2005. pp. 946–976.

26. Rogers S. Evidence-based intervention for language development in young children with autism. In: Charman T, Stone W, editors. Social and Communication Development in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Early Identification, Diagnosis, and Intervention. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. pp. 143–179.

27. Wetherby A, Woods J. Effectiveness of early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders beginning in the second year of life. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 2006;26:67–82.

28. Howard J, et al. A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism. Research on Developmental Disabilities. 2005;26:359–383.[PubMed]

29. Remington B, et al. Early intensive behavioral intervention: Outcomes for children with autism and their parents after two years. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 2007;112:418–438.[PubMed]

30. Tsiouri l, Greer R. Inducing Vocal Verbal Behavior in Children with Severe Language Delays Through Rapid Motor Imitation Responding. Journal of Behavioral Education. 2003 Sep;Vol 12(3):185–206. 2003.

31. Ross DE, Greer R. Generalized imitation and the mand: Inducing first instances of speech in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2003;24(1):58–74.[PubMed]

32. Jones E, Carr D, Feeley K. Multiple effects of joint attention interveniton for children with autism. Behavior Modification. 2006;30:282–834.[PubMed]

33. Yoder P, Layton TL. Speech following sign language training in autistic children with minimal verbal language. J Autism Dev Disord. 1988;18(2):217–229.[PubMed]

34. Stokes KS. Planning for the future of a severely handicapped autistic child. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1977;7(3):288–302.[PubMed]

35. McGee G, Morrier M, Daly T. An incidental teaching approach to early intervention for toddlers with autism. Journal for the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 1999;24:133–146.

36. Koegel LK, et al. Pivotal response intervention I: Overview of approach. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 1999;24(3):174–185.

37. Anderson S, Romanczyk R. Early intervention for children with autism: Continuum-based behavioral models. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 1999;24:162–173.

38. Hart B, Risley T. Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1975;8:411–420.[PMC free article][PubMed]

39. Koegel RL, MC OD, Koegel LK. A natural language teaching paradigm for nonverbal autistic children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1987;17(2):187–200.[PubMed]

40. Laski KE, Charlop MH, Schreibman L. Training parents to use the natural language paradigm to increase their autistic children's speech. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988;21(4):391–400.[PMC free article][PubMed]

41. Delprato DJ. Comparisons of discrete-trial and normalized behavioral language intervention for young children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders. 2001;31(3):315–325.[PubMed]

42. Smith T. Discrete trial training in the treatment of autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 2001;16:86–92.

43. Mirenda P, Santogrossi J. A prompt-free strategy to teach pictorial communication system use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 1985;1:143–150.

44. McGee G, et al. A modified incidental teaching procedure for autistic youth: Acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1983;16:329–338.[PMC free article][PubMed]

45. Rogers-Warren A, Warren S. Mand for verbalization: Facilitating the generalization of newly trained language in children. Behavior Modification. 1980;4:230–245.

46. Kaiser A, Yoder P, Keetz A. In: Evaluating milieu teaching, in Causes and effects in communication and language intervention. Reichle SWJ, editor. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes; 1992. pp. 9–47.

47. Yoder P, McDuffie A. Teaching young children with autism to talk. Seminars in Speech and Language. 2006;27:161–172.[PubMed]

48. Yoder P, Stone W. Randomized Comparison of Two Communication Interventions for Preschoolers With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2006;74(3):426–435.[PubMed]

49. Matson JL, et al. An evaluation of two methods for increasing self-initiated verbalizations in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1993;26(3):389–398.[PMC free article][PubMed]

50. Yoder P, Warren SF. Effects of prelinguistic milieu teaching and parent responsivity education on dyads involving children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2002 Dec;Vol 45(6):1158–1174. 2002. [PubMed]

51. Koegel RL, Koegel LK, Surratt A. Language intervention and disruptive behavior in preschool children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1992;22(2):141–153.[PubMed]

52. Koegel L. Interventions to facilitate communication in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2000;30:383–391.[PubMed]

53. McGee GG, et al. Promoting reciprocal interactions via peer incidental teaching. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992;25(1):117–126.[PMC free article][PubMed]

54. Wetherby A, Woods J. In: Autism in Infancy. Chawarska K, Volkmar F, editors. in press.

55. Weider S, Greenspan S. Climbing the Symbolic Ladder in the DIR Model Through Floor Time/Interactive Play. Autism. 2003;7:425–435.[PubMed]

56. Greenspan S, Wieder S. Developmental patterns and outcomes in infants and children with disorders in relating and communicating: A chart review of 200 cases of children with autistic spectrum diagnosis. The journal of developmental and learning disorders. 1997;1(1):87–139.

57. Greenspan S, Weider S. A functional developmental approach to autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the Association fo Persons with Severe Handicaps. 1999;24:147–161.

58. Gutstein S, Sheely R. Relationship development intervention with children, adolescents, and adults. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2002.

59. Gutstein S, Burgess A, Montfort M. Evaluation of the Relationship Development Intervention Program. Autism. 2007;11:397–411.[PubMed]

60. Sussman F. More than Words. Totonto: The Hanen Center. 2001

61. Girolametto L, Pearce P, Weitzman E. Effects of lexical intervention on the phonology of late talkers. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 1996;40:338–348.

One thought on “Prelinguistic Milieu Teaching Definition Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *